Giant Bottle Of Patron

risks of bisphenol A, the plastic used in baby bottles and children's toys

Si torna a parlare del Bisfenolo A e dei sui rischi . Si tratta di una sostanza plastica contenuta nella maggiorparte di biberon e prodotti per bambini neonati come biberon, bottiglie di plastica, giocattoli e stoviglie infrangibili.

Un recentissimo articolo pubblicato su Nature, qui potete leggerlo interamente , fa tornare all' attenzione pubblica circa la sua tossicità. Stare a contatto con il Bisfenolo A può portare allo sviluppo di cancro alla prostata e al cervello oltre a favorire ritardi nello sviluppo dei neonati . Il Bisfenolo A non è the only component observed for health risks, there are also phthalates, already banned in toys made in EU , but there are no guarantees as to those "false" without CE mark for bisphenol A the evidence is not overwhelming, but the precautionary principle - after some studies in which disease was associated with male sexual development in the fetus and the decline of fertility in adult humans - has led many countries such as Denmark and Canada (and producers) to to ban the manufacture of baby bottles. And the regulatory agencies of the old continent are developing ad hoc recommendations. Although this study

dated 2006, linking the exposure Bisphenol to increase development of prostate cancer. American chemical companies that produce the plastic component, however, deny the offending studies, according to them the fact that bisphenol inject under the skin in experiments with mice instead of orally as it is for newborn babies in contact with the bottle is misleading .

However, if the Bisphenol A is suspected that affect the proper development of the reproductive system, the question is more 'high regard for that are already banned phthalates in toys in Europe.

Cyst Between My Breasts

From the windmill!

Dear friends,
with great pride and pride, I announce the closure of the dangerous portal www.linkstreaming.com ad opera dei coraggiosissimi finanzieri cagliaritani che vedete nella foto qui sopra. ( l'articolo originale )

Il giornale che pubblica la notizia (l'unione sarda) si fregia di aver avviato l'inchiesta con un articolo sulla pirateria online. Se andrete a leggere la pagina sull'oscuramento di linkstreaming, potrete facilmente immaginare quanto accurato doveva essere! Frasi come: " avrebbero acquisito i film da canali ancora sconosciuti, li avrebbero caricati sul portale rendendoli così accessibili a tutti " la dicono lunga. 

Su questi portali (ma sarebbe più corretto parlare di forum o - in questo caso- di blog) not loaded films of dubious origin, but published only links to video sharing sites like YouTube, for instance. The links are always the same. The thousands of Web TV that there are in the network, goes round and round offering the same stuff.
illegally uploaded movies on youtube (and others) by unruly members, that a simple request of the holder of copyright will be deleted, with slap on the ears, you rascal, who at best, a repeat offender, we will cancel the account.


Copyright? course is violated. Certainly it is not legal. Not even fair. People arrives, load a movie on the Internet, everyone looking at him, someone makes us a penny (two cents, not billions of euros!) for publishing the link ...


I'm not saying it is right, but the world is going well and you can not do anything. You want to fight against the windmills! If I want to see the latest episodes of my favorite American TV series, without waiting for months without pay € 50 (minimo!) a month for sky, without having to pay € 14 a month for mediaset premium, without waiting for years, commercial breaks, to sip fixed hours of its broadcast networks, helping to enrich it (if possible) even more, the solution is a webtv hang out, see them whenever you want, how you want, for free, without interruption (except the infamous 54 minutes of megavideo!), dubbed or subtitled, with the opportunity to comment with others ...


The TV is dying. This is good news. I can not feel guilty if I agonize tool with which for years have managed to influence this country. I can not feel guilty if I refuse to buy something from the glittering shop raiset. If these people could do his job as a trader, offers us what we want at a lower price, rather than rant against the non- income. Instead of inventing ways to prevent the wind blowing.


We could offer the exclusive material on the porch of a webtv authorized and people swarming. It rifarebbero costs through advertising. The same mediaset, having regard to the request of users who search for and watch clips from shows on youtube, instead of organizing a section of its website to review the programs already aired, thanks to gaining back the replicas advertising space on board screen, do you prefer Case (vincendola!) to youtube.

At Sony, the market where they know something, have come up with the internet TV.


... and as times change, it is sad to see newspapers that bully that it has initiated a kidnapping and a darkening unfair, financiers and judges who act without knowing what it is ...


The only thing certain is that the six suspects are not convicted for a list of links in the public domain, but their names, ages and backgrounds, are published in the newspapers as if they were dangerous criminals.
A public pillory. A purge of the state. The proof that everything is forbidden to countermand.

Evidence that Money can buy justice!